Saturday 4 December 2010

WikiLeaks & the Potential for New Histories

There are many collective questions being provoked by the WikiLeaks exposures.

How much do we really want to know?

Do we trust our leadership?

What cost for transparency?

The public seems to be buying into the call by government and mass media to stop
WikiLeaks and put Assange on trial.

When a system is under threat, it responds by attacking the assailant.

What is interesting is that it is not only the US government (one senator has
called for Assange´s assassination) who are after Assange.

Even friends of mine on the left, as well as political apathetics seem to have it in for
him.

People identify and believe in the system more than they care to admit at a dinner
party. They are happy to talk anarchical politics but when push comes to shove, and something threatens them - they get afraid. They protect. They yearn to uphold the status quo.

The justifiable problem most people have with the Leaks is with the potential human fall out.

This is without doubt a major concern. For most, the threat to an individual
life is too great a cost for information.. And it is an utterly humane stand point.

Let the state keep its secrets, that is why it is elected after all - to be the custodian of that which we don´t want to know.

But it is also philosophically bankrupt.

The notion that the machinery of the state is fundamentally sound, good or trustworthy is utter nonsense.

These machines have existed in secrecy and all too often without unaccountability for centuries, and you can find then at the heart of every war, assassination, deprivation and torture since time began.

Jesus, the last American administration sanctioned mass torture for crying out loud.

And still we would rather not know.

We rail against Assange because his revelations threaten innocents.

Yet we don´t want to look at our own complicity in the terrible deprivation of things,
upheld by our own votes.

And here is the point for me.

WikiLeaks is not about challenging (necessarily) government. It is about challenging the
the very systems that control government.

Governments come and go, but the state machine - business, the military sector,
the vested interests of the very rich & powerful - stay.

The government is essentially an illusion. It is the mask the devil wears, or the
puppet the puppet master wields.

Julian Assange is not a terrorist and he is not a freedom fighter. He is just a vessel.

The systems which have not been challenged or exposed, or held accountable for
centuries are now having to face up to a new phenomenon.

Our society is porous and the old static systems are under threat from the new
technologies.

Assange is a symptom of this, not the cause. He is just a consequence of evolution.
What he does or doesn´t do someone else will.

And if we believe that there are not misdeeds and manipulations happening behind
close doors, then we are just fools.

New frontiers are opening, and change necessarily means a degree of suffering.

That is not to justify any threat to any human life, how ever could you?

But you have to face the reality of what is happening sociologically.

And if you think that governments are best left to deal with things then you just have
to look at any page in your history manual.

There have been just wars. But so few.

The new world is unfolding before our eyes. It will not collapse under its own weight.
But it will be threatened. And there will be fall out. And there will be casualties.

But the history we come from is not the one that we have to live in. There is the
potential for new, richer histories. Do we have the courage to build them?

There needs to be more openness and accountability. It is the only way that
human greed, vanity, lust and desire for power can ever be held in check.

I am for Julian Assange.

2 comments:

  1. So the true disparity between political public rhetoric and the rhetoric behind supposed closed doors has been revealed, but for me the real surprise was that this disparity was not wider. The headlines that the Guardian have slung up on a daily basis are far from shocking, to be expected if you have a fair knowledge of global affairs.

    Take for example:

    ‘According to these classified cables, Saudi Arabia wanted Washington to bomb Iran, the UK harbours "deep concerns about the safety and security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons", and Russia is considered a "virtual mafia state" with its president, Vladimir Putin, accused of amassing "illicit proceeds" from his time in office”


    But now I can only imagine the deep paranoia of those in power that have something to hide. Suddenly now it must seem like any dark secret from the past can be revealed for all to see. Unfortunately I feel this paranoia will only serve to drive more deeper secretive cloak and dagger activities – and this really really is not a good thing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Robert,

    Thanks for the feedback. The irony is definitely that there is nothing shocking as you say.

    Politics is an ugly game, and so none of this is much of a surprise.

    Maybe you are right that things might get more covert & secretive as a result....certainly there will be more paranoia behind closed doors....

    But I think that if the potential for accountability / exposure is greater, then hopefully corruption etc lessens.

    I´m just looking forward to the Roswell files & hearing the truth about Kennedy!

    ReplyDelete